0
Comments

BoulevardDriveInTheater

John Arnold  posted a really good article on www.entrepreneur.com talking about the creation of successful online videos.  As a lawyer you are no longer able to avoid the fact that online video is a huge draw for clients both present and future.

John demonstrated a pretty useful technique in inserting an automatic playing video as the introduction.  It’s a little long for the introduction (1.40 minutes) but shows a variety of ways to use video, including inserting sponsored adds in the copy.  You’ll notice that he’s inserted the video in a small screen which makes the file smaller and causes the video to load faster.

He gives 5 Tips:

  • Quality Planning for every video. Since videos are not as easily edited as text you need to think about where you are going with your videos before you start.  You know, “begin with the end in mind.”
  • Quality Production can make or break your image (which I assume he means your brand).  Now he recommends either buying high end equipment or renting a video production studio.  For what most lawyers are going to use you’ll be a lot better off with (a)  good lighting, (b)  good audio (read that lapel microphone), and (c) interesting content.  Get the video up and get lots of video up.  Here’s a link to an example of what I’m doing in the bankruptcy arena.
  • Quality Distribution is tip #3.  It does no good to put the video up if it is not seen.  He’s got some good recommendations for video syndication.  Remember YouTube is the No. 2 search engine behind Google.  I recommend www.tubemogul.com and personally use www.trafficgeyser.com for syndication service.
  • Quality Interactivity (do you see a pattern here) is all about engaging the viewer.  Youtube now allows links right in the video.  John mentions allowing live chats which is a pretty interesting concept.  I’d love to hear from you on how that is working for you if you are doing it.
  • Quality Sharing addresses the concern that you need not try to create a “viral” video if your goal is to generate leads or immediate purchase.  Not sure about this one.  I think you’ll want everyone who might get a benefit from viewing your video to view it.  Are you thinking of creating your video so it can go on mobile devices?  You should be.

John has some pretty good tips and I recommend you take a look at the original article. As you are watching the introduction video, think about how you could use this on your website in places other than the welcome page.  Understand that the tips provided in the article are applicable across the board including for lawyer videos.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
0
Comments
Live the Life of Your Dreams

Live the Life of Your Dreams

Do you remember when you first heard the statement that “The Law is a Jealous Mistress?”  I do.

I was sitting in Contracts at the University Of Tennessee School Of Law.  I had Professor Cook who was an outstanding teacher and an equally generous taskmaster.  We were nearing the end of the quarter (back in the old days schools were on quarters rather than semesters) and exams were approaching.  We were sitting around waiting on Cook to arrive and the talk turned to the evening games.  No, not the basketball games; the games down on the strip at the favorite watering hole.

I remember saying, “No, I’ve got to study.”  I did a lot of that in law school.  They told us at orientation that 1/3 of us would not graduate.  I didn’t want to be in the one-third.  One of the guys in the group, after hearing of my plans for the evening, said the words, words I’ve repeated both orally and internally hundreds of times, “The Law is a Jealous Mistress?”

Fast forward to my first job as an attorney.  I heard it again and repeated it to myself.

While most of us would not seriously consider having a “mistress”, it’s pretty easy to let the “law” serve that function.  I tell folks that the “law” will take as much of you as you are willing to give.  However, you are in control.  You are the decider; but you have to decide.

So here are 3 tips to avoid if you don’t want the “law” to be the jealous mistress of your life.

1.  Recognize That Limits are Needed. Make sure that you acknowledge to yourself and to others that limits to the intrusion of the “law” into your life are necessary if you are to enjoy the life of your dreams.  OK, I’ve said it.  It’s OK to set limits.  No it’s up to you.  Your partners, your mentors, your associates and your clients only have one thing on their mind when they call you:  whatever is on their mind.  They aren’t thinking about your daughter’s birthday party.  They aren’t thinking about the soapbox derby race on Saturday.  They are thinking about whatever task, problem or challenge is on their mind.  So it’s up to you.  Right now make a decision (several actually).  Decide that it’s OK for your career to say no from time to time.  Decide to make your law practice a priority when you are working but only a secondary priority when not at work.  Now, have the guts to say “No.” Be sure to use your loving voice, “I’d love to help you with that, but I’m already committed.”

2. Create a Life Plan First. Create a plan for your person life before you create a plan for your business (that includes the law) life.  One of the biggest regrets people make is that they life their lives in whatever time’s left.  This occurs usually due to the unwillingness to spend the time necessary to think through what you want your life to look like.  Lawyers are generally a pretty smart bunch.  However, it happens to us just as well.  Why?  Because it’s just easier to live life with “what’s left” rather than developing a plan for your life, then develop a business to support it.  Remember that one of the reasons you choose “lawyering” as a livelihood is so you could provide a great life for you and your family.  That’s going to take work and not just work at work!  Take a day off this week.  Turn the phones off, (your blackberry too) and spend some time thinking about this question:  “If I could design my life to be anything I want it to be, what would it look like?”  Be bold with the answers but be truthful to yourself.  It will be better if you write with a pen (rather than a computer) as you are doing this exercise.  Then once you have painted a picture of your life “designed by you” consider “what do I have to do to have this life.”  You are going to be called upon to make a number of decisions, including decisions on what your individual priorities will be.  Now go backwards.  If this is what I want my life to be, what does this year have to look like, this month….  Be sure to date your life plan. You’ll return to it often.

3.  Engage Your Partner in Your Plan. My wife says she never knows what I’m thinking.  That’s pretty strange given the fact that she expects me to always know what she’s thinking.  Seriously though, if you are building a life with another person, let them in on your plan.  I always recommend doing step No. 2 above by yourself.  This way you’ll have the freedom to be honest.  Only after you’ve designed the life of your dreams can you then share it with your life partner and together perhaps you both can build a plan that blends both of your desires and dreams.  This is super, super important for a number of reasons.  First, be sure that you are both traveling along the same path.  Recognize that some compromises are often required by both of you.  That’s what building a life together is all about.  Second, you’ll have to make priority decisions that may impact your finances and often your career.  Be sure you are both together on them.  Finally, when the mountain gets tall or the valley gets deep, you’re going to need your partner to be at your side not in back of you or even in front of you.

These are just three tips to help you get started.

While I agree that “The Law is a Jealous Mistress,” I’m likewise convinced that you don’t have to have a mistress unless you live life by default rather than design.

I’d love to hear your thoughts on this topic.  Please comment below.

Perhaps you have a friend or cohort that might need to consider this topic.  If so, please pass the post along.

Talk soon,

Dan

Image Credit:  bjorkish

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
0
Comments

So you’ve done your marketing. Perhaps driven great web traffic; perhaps a referral is at the door; or perhaps you sitting across from a person you’ve represented before.

So what are you going to ask? When are you going to ask it? How are you going to ask it?

See full size image

As lawyers we are pretty much trained to think in a linear fashion. One event follows another. Have you noticed that non-lawyers don’t always think that way. Sometimes I’m meeting with clients and I think they’ve got what we called as kids “Mexican Jumping Beans” in the brain. Darting here and there, from topic to topic, actor to actor, without any rationale connection.

It is certainly part of your job to manage the conversation so that you can acquire the information necessary to identify the legal issues and/or problems. How are you going to do that?

Do you “begin with the end in mind” as Stephen Covey is so often promoting? Do you have a plan at all?

I began this with a series of questions because they cause me to think about the way I handle an initial meeting with a prospect. There are at least three key issues you’ve got to address in that very first meeting.

1. Can you trust me with your legal needs. Too often we think because we have nice offices or a great receptionist this part of the equation has already been met. Believe me we needn’t think too much of ourselves here. The person sitting across from you has on their mind the most important legal issue of the century (to them). You see it’s the most important because it’s probably the only one they are dealing with right now. They’ve got to decide for themselves in the first meeting: “Can I entrust my legal problem with this particular lawyer.” So how will you answer this (usually non-verbalized) question?

2. Can I achieve what you want? There’s just way too many lawyer shows on television. Look, I love Denny Crane as much as the next guy, but let’s get serious. It’s pretty difficult to resolve the legal problems of our clients the way they are resolved on television. BUT, this may be the only picture of conflict resolution your prospective client has seen or understands. Don’t leave that initial meeting without understanding what the client wants and whether you can actually achieve it. Naturally, most clients begin with expectations that simply can’t be satisfied. For example, if you ask a person charged with burglary, “What would be the ideal result you’d want me to achieve for you?” The answer most likely is, “I’d like all this to go away and disappear.” You and I may think that is unreasonable, but Denny Crane makes that happen in less than an hour (after considering commercials). Get real about what you can do to help. Now is the time to set reasonable expectations, not when you’ve got a big bill you’re trying to get paid.

3. Can you afford to pay me to help you? I’ve never understood why lawyers are so fearful about talking about money with clients. Yet, time and time again, we hear complaints that the client never knew how the attorney was to get paid. That’s our fault. We’ve got to treat our practice like a business and not a hobby. Have you noticed that in order to get out of the doctor’s office you’ve got to go directly by (and stop) at a payment/billing window? Why is that? Now I don’t suggest that we imitate the doctors on this one. We should do better. Let’s get the money issues out of the way at the outset. It will make your relationship much simpler and will most likely reduce the number of conflicts you have with otherwise well served clients.

On each of these questions, think in advance about how you are going to address them in the initial conference. A little advance planning will go a long way to insuring your retention, a good client experience and payment sufficient to keep the lights on.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
0
Comments

I’ve been enjoying a few days at the beach in the run up to the July 4th Holiday. This is a pretty big holiday in the United States especially when we have so many men and women deployed in foreign lands fighting what is increasingly becoming an unpopular war. Of course my wife and I’ve soaked up the sun and enjoyed the sights and sounds of the ocean.

On July 4th we watched the “rockets red glare” during a pretty spectacular fireworks display in Surfside Beach, South Carolina. All of this has caused me to do some thinking and reflecting about the idea of celebrating and enjoying freedom.

As Thomas Jefferson, who was admitted to the Virginia bar in 1767, labored over the Declaration of Independence he wanted to write a document that would establish clearly the right of self-determination. A declaration that here we would not be subject to the rule of the British Crown.

The Declaration of Independence was the foundational instrument for a fledgling nation yet to be formed. As a result of his work, and the work of many others, our nation has long persevered during both good times and bad.

Is there room for improvement in the United States? Yes, certainly. However, having traveled in over 20 countries outside the States, rest assured that we are in a pretty good position here.

As a general principle we are free to develop ourselves and our businesses to whatever extent we desire. Our limitation is generally not the government, not “circumstances”, but really we are our own limitation.

Recognize that we have a choice to

- – Practice Law or Not; There are lots of good uses for legal training;

- – Private Practice or Corporate Counsel or Government Counsel

- – Big Firm, Small Firm, No Firm

Recognize that we have a choice on who we represent. Sometimes under the pressure of the next payroll or the quarterly numbers we forget this very special freedom. We are free to “Just say No.”

Sometimes I think we should say no more often. If you’re feeling uncomfortable at the first meeting with a client, perhaps that’s your intuition that this is one you should pass on. Say no when it’s not a good fit. It’s better for you; better for the client; and better for the profession.

Recognize that Clients have a choice too. We all already know this, but we need to be re-reminded.

We need to be re-reminded because it’s important not to forget what a special honor it is when someone or some company entrusts you with its legal needs. The problem may be small or may be big. It may involve money or liberty. When a prospective client says, “I want you,” your should beam a little brighter. Of all the lawyers in your town, your state or your country, you were chosen. Be careful never to miss the significance of that choice.

Because clients have entrusted their legal needs to you (notice the word [en-trust-ed]? Treat the relationship as a special trust.

Do all you can do. Do everything you say you will do. Do it the very best you can do.

When you do that, i.e. give your very best effort, you’ve honored that trust that was invested in you.

When I think about freedom this way I really have a reason to celebrate.

We have just 6 more months in this calendar year. Who else will trust you and how will you celebrate the freedom expressed by that choice?

I’d love to hear you thoughts in the comments below.

Talk soon,

Dan Scott

The Lawyers Coach

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
0
Comments

Well Drilling Platform

U.S. District Judge Martin L.C. Feldman ruled yesterday that the 6 month moratorium on deep water drilling in the gulf will likely to be proved to be “arbitrary and capriciously issued.”

Regardless of where you are on the political spectrum the opinion offers and interesting analysis of what the United States Government took into account (or didn’t) when it decided to halt all drilling in wells any deeper than 500 feet.

Here is a complete copy of the opinion (thanks Wall Street Journal).

Judge Feldman who is a Tulane Law grad, poses this question: “If some drilling equipment parts are flawed, is it rational to say all are? Are all airplanes a danger because one was? All oil tankers like Exxon Valdez? Al trains? All mines?”  Seems to be a reasonable question.

After considering all that was before him, including the report you’ve heard so much about that might have be “supplemented” after the scientists signed it, Judge Feldman granted the Plaintiffs a preliminary injunction against the enforcement of the moratorium. The opinion is definitely worth the read.

No doubt this will not be the last we hear on this ruling.

Photo Credit photo240779

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • YahooMyWeb
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • TwitThis
  • Live
  • LinkedIn
  • Pownce
  • MySpace
Login